Interestingly, if such a rotor with wings would also be more efficient than a traditional propeller for the ship. Maybe he wouldn't beat as much unproductive foam as the traditional one
Andrew
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Okay Marlyn, I see you've started to follow my engine closely .. That's good because that's the future of 4-stroke engines, but you have to find the right answers to a lot of new questions first. How many ? Well, I think that about 90 percent of the old knowledge needs to be thrown away and replaced with a new one .. many have aversion to it, because they feel that it is so .. and in addition, these units have to be converted into imperial ones .. You pointed out to me that I should also give in imperial ones, because you understand the matter well, and you want to help me spread the idea .. And here you are 100% right with these ones ..Merlyn wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:38 am About this 3 cylinder engine ANDREW,
See the top two cylinders have a scraper ring fitted but have only one oil control ring and only one compression ring fitted?
How is this?
Two stroke I take it?
Why two crank journals on the top picture?
Why not two conrods on the same journal?
Moving onto the biggest lower piston again one missing compression ring?
Where is the scraper ring?
There is none?
What’s the score here then re the piston thrust face with no lower scraper ring fitted?
Tramline jobby here then in the making?
Looks like if one were fitted at BDC it would stand outside the liner/ parent bore, is the bottom end got a large relief taper machined in it to simulate a piston ring clamp type situation for re entry purposes?
What’s with this “ windows speech ?” Do you mean ports?
Also digging into my toolbox right by my bearing scraper I remove my dividers ( the imperial ones, not those metric ones ) and see that by measuring that long stroke top end travel that the lower scraper ring will sit outside the bore at BDC?
Furthermore those Conrod’s appear to have no H section present?
So is this an H.P. I.P. L.P. Set up?
Also why is the R/H/S PISTON running behind the L/H one?
Carb or injected?
Giving the matter further in depth thoughts I can only conclude that that mm ( Mickey Mouse ) measurement system that you are forced to use at your Lat/Long has perhaps affected your complex calculations to such an extent that by converting to pounds shillings and pence ( ie Imperial ) could well save the day and prevent this engine from perhaps running the other way.
To that extent I would be more than willing to loan you my Imperial dividers by V L Churchill. ( of course )
They would, as such prove to you that beyond all reasonable doubt that N is indeed the unknown number and progress your advanced complex designs of which many of us out here struggle to take on board.
Opposed piston engine with a difference then?
Well, since no one wants Russian gas, it needs to be replaced with something .. Well, with such vessels, Trawlers - FELIX processing plants ...Feliks wrote: ↑Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:14 am
Since when the keg came into existence, for it is her shipping by ships constituted a spot of bother. That is how, they forgot to attach, while swinging the ship rolled from one side to other side, hitting in not around with great energy. There was this great danger for the crew. That is how, they forgot to attach, while swinging the ship rolled from one side to other side, hitting in not around with great energy. I decided to use this energy for the production of the electric current with the help of the oscillatory dynamo. It is a pendulum driving the oscillatory dynamo around so with keg. It will be sufficient to install shipboard or for other swimming raft, and during waving we have the electricity, rather than danger
block of osillating dynamo:
Regards Andrew![]()
Oh Merlyn, I'm glad you're in good health!